Bodleian Archives & Manuscripts will be offline on Friday 26 June for essential maintenance work. You will still be able to use MARCO to search our catalogues, or you can download catalogue PDFs in advance of the temporary shutdown by clicking the ‘PDF version’ button on collection homepages within Bodleian Archives & Manuscripts.
We apologise for any inconvenience.
On 3-4 November, I attended a two-day event at the British Library that highlighted the challenges and approaches of collecting materials created during times of war, conflict and crises. Through a series of panels and discussions, museum and library professionals, researchers and private collectors shared examples of incredible historical and contemporary initiatives to preserve diverse materials and heritage sites at risk of loss, decay or destruction.
Having recently worked on the joint Bodleian Libraries and History of Science Museum Collecting COVID project, I was particularly interested in contemporary programmes of collecting. Our project, which ran from 2021-2023, aimed to acquire and preserve the University of Oxford’s research response to the COVID-19 pandemic. It enabled us to capture, catalogue and publish over ninety oral history interviews.
Modern collections/initiatives showcased included:
Rapid collecting is a means to collect documentary evidence, preserve cultural memories and commemorate events. By providing access to these collections, institutions are then able to build a body of evidence and facilitate research. I was struck by the similarities between modern initiatives and those that had taken place a century before. Some of the contemporary examples of collections crowdsourcing harked back to the collecting of ephemera during the First World War. Dr Ann-Marie Foster highlighted the Bond of Sacrifice Collection and Women’s Work Collection (Imperial War Museums) in her presentation with Alison Bailey, in which families sent items memorialising loved ones, as examples of early collecting initiatives. Modern rapid collecting work has meant that contemporary archivists/curators have taken up this tradition, working actively to save materials at risk of loss through intentional selection.
As well as crowdsourcing and outreach, other strategies institutions draw upon in an increasingly online world are web archiving, digitisation and digital preservation. With social media now a main mode of communication for millions, web archiving is a useful tool to preserve and present online response to global events. Work to capture websites relating to recent events is ongoing at both the Bodleian Libraries and British Library. I found Archive-It to be an incredibly useful tool to capture and publish a range of web pages (including the social media pages of COVID-19 researchers, given with permission) for our project, which without reactive selection and preservation, would otherwise have been at risk of loss.
Overall, the event highlighted that institutions must use active strategies towards preserving at-risk materials created during ongoing crises and conflicts, including:
The Algorithmic Archive project is a one year project funded by the Mellon Foundation. As part of the first Work Package, we explored how researchers from different disciplines use social media data to answer various research questions.
This post is the third in a three-part series presenting use cases drawn from research conducted as part of the Algorithmic Archive project.
We would like to thank the researchers who generously shared insights from their work.
Research questions and aim(s):
Trust And Visuality: Everyday digital practices (TRAVIS) is an ESRC project which has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme. This research project that looks at how young adults experience, build and express trust in news and social media images related to wellbeing and health. It explores how and why people trust some visuals over others and how content creators establish trustworthiness through visual content. The TRAVIS project involves cross-national collaboration of multiple research teams located at different universities in UK and Europe. This includes the University of Oxford, in particular the Oxford team is based School of Geography and the Environment.
Social media data used:
The project included data collected indirectly from platforms including Facebook, Instagram, TikTok and YouTube (see below).
Tools and methods adopted:
Data collection from social media consisted of screenshots taken from the devices of interviewed young adults, as the TRAVIS project investigates the meaning of social media posts (visual content) via interviews with young adult users. The datasets generated from this method of collection counts around 400 screenshots, stored on an institutional cloud drive, which is accessible by the whole team.
[1] Further information about the TRAVIS project are available here: https://www.tlu.ee/en/bfm/researchmedit/trust-and-visuality-everyday-digital-practices-travis
The Algorithmic Archive project is a one year project funded by the Mellon Foundation. As part of the first Work Package, we explored how researchers from different disciplines use social media data to answer various research questions.
This post is the second in a three-part series presenting use cases drawn from research conducted as part of the Algorithmic Archive project.
We would like to thank the researchers who generously shared insights from their work.
Research questions and aim(s):
The study sought to investigate how the YouTube platform operates, focusing on algorithmic activity and the strategies employed by both human and automated (robot) actors within federal and regional elections. The aim was to understand the impact that this system of mediation has on society and to demystify preconceptions of ideologically neutral technologies in highly disputed political events. The research focuses on two case studies: 1) the 2018 Ontario (Canada) election and 2) the 2018 Brazilian Federal Election. The data collection was carried out during the campaigning periods, between May and June in Ontario, and between August and October 2018 in Brazil.
Social media data used:
The research focussed on the sole YouTube platform. Specifically, the researchers collected information about recommended videos starting from specific keywords related to the election campaign.
Tools and methods adopted:
The data collection was carried out using a Python script developed by the Algo Transparency project. The script automates YouTube search operations based on specified keywords (e.g., the names of the candidates), allowing the researcher to gather video-related data and the relative ranking position displayed to the user. Once the keywords were defined, the tool retrieved links for the top four results for each keyword and then examined the recommendation section. This process was repeated four times, each time collecting recommended videos, simulating a user interacting with algorithmic suggestions.
Data collected was stored on personal devices and the institutional cloud, and can be visualized at the following links:
[1] Reis, R., Zanetti, D., & Frizzera, L. (2020). A conveniência dos algoritmos: o papel do YouTube nas eleições brasileiras de 2018. Compolítica, 10(1), 35–58. https://doi.org/10.21878/compolitica.2020.10.1.333
The Algorithmic Archive project is a one year project funded by the Mellon Foundation. As part of the first Work Package, we explored how researchers from different disciplines use social media data to answer various research questions.
This post is the first in a three-part series presenting use cases drawn from research conducted as part of the Algorithmic Archive project.
We would like to thank the researchers who generously shared insights from their work.
Research questions and aim(s):
The researcher wanted to explore the construction and influence of information trustworthiness within social media movements in the context of the Hong Kong protests and the #BlackLivesMatter movements. Social media platforms offer a digital space for social movements to facilitate the diffusion of critical information and the formation of networks, coordinating protests and reach a wider audience.
Social media data used:
This study focused on Twitter as it was used evenly by both social movements, and the researcher already had an established presence on this platform. Also, at the time of data collection (2020-2021), access to Twitter data for academic research was still relatively open to researchers.
For the purpose of this study, the researcher examined the follow and followers’ relationship of top accounts counting millions of followers that had been selected as big information disseminators, including organisations, individuals or accounts serving a particular niche or purpose.
Data collection was conducted at a specific point in time in 2021. Social media data quantitative analysis (e.g. cluster analysis) was complemented with qualitative data collected via an online survey.
Tools and methods adopted:
The researcher requested and obtained access to the Twitter API. However, high-level coding skills were required to access the data, which the researcher did not have at that time due to their predominantly qualitative research background. To address this, the researcher found and used a Go script called Nucoll[2], which is freely available on GitHub and enabled the researcher to collect the required data. Nucoll is a command-line tool that, according to its developer, retrieves data from Twitter using keyword instructions, for which the developer provided example queries and brief explanations. For each social movement, the researcher selected three organisations: one large organisation, one activist group, and one additional account that was relevant to the movement. Once these accounts were selected, they were processed through the script to capture all following/follower relationships and combine them into a graph for each protest analysed. Further data visualisation and analysis — including clustering and network analysis — were conducted using Gephi.
[1] Charlotte Im, The Construction and Influence of Information Trustworthiness in Social Movements, Doctoral Thesis, University College London (UCL), 2024.
[2] https://github.com/jdevoo/nucoll
What is the Algorithmic Archive Project?
In 2024, the Algorithmic Archive Project has received funding from the Mellon Foundation to carry out scoping research that will ultimately support the Bodleian Libraries in the development of a lasting, interoperable infrastructure and sustainable strategies for archiving web-based data, including social media data and algorithms. The project is part of the broader Future Bodleian programme aiming to expand and evolve its centuries-old role by engaging with the digital domain.
Why archive social media data?
In the past two decades, social media platforms have become a central means of communication, enabling people from across the globe to engage in discussions that transcend geographical borders, reflect on contemporary events and contribute to collective memory. Given their profound impact on society, researchers across various disciplines increasingly rely on social media data to analyse social, economic, and political phenomena. However, social media data is inherently ephemeral, subject to continuous evolution driven by changes in platform leadership, economic gain, and shifting policies. For this reason, it is essential to preserve and provide reliable and sustainable access for the (re)use of such an important resource.
Steps towards the development of a social media and algorithmic data service.
The Algorithmic Archive project is articulated in four interconnected phases aimed to investigate the research, archiving, legal and technical landscape to inform the Bodleian Libraries’ future development of a social and algorithmic data service.
The image below offers a visual summary of the work packages that the Research Officers have been exploring over this one-year project.
In upcoming blog posts, we will present some of the results and highlight use cases drawn from research conducted with social media data.
Between 2-4 April 2025, I attended the very first edition of the Born-digital Collections, Archives and Memory conference, together with my colleague from the Algorithmic Archive Project, Pierre Marshall. The conference was co-organised by the School of Advanced Study at the University of London, the Endangered Material Knowledge Programme at The British Museum, The British Library and Aarhus University. This international event offered the unique opportunity to bring together academics and practitioners from diverse disciplines, career paths and backgrounds to explore the transformative impact of born-digital cultural heritage. The diverse range of research, methodologies, and practices presented in this year’s programme offered valuable insights and reflections, particularly relevant to the Algorithmic Archive project and its goal of developing sustainable, persistent approaches to preserving born-digital heritage created on the web, especially on social media platforms.
The inspiring opening keynote by Dorothy Berry, Digital Curator at the Smithsonian National Museum of African American History and Culture, highlighted the vital importance of preserving ephemeral and fragile forms of born-digital heritage (such as social media) —many of which have increasingly replaced traditional modes of memory-making, also drawing attention to the pressing need for a deeper understanding of what and how born-digital memory should be preserved. In particular, she stressed the need to record the “full context” in which born-digital records and materials were embedded before being collected and included in specific collections. However, she also highlighted the challenges many memory institutions face due to uneven resource distribution, an issue that may hinders both the development and long-term sustainability of innovative preservation efforts.
Given the richness of the BDCAM25 program, it is incredibly difficult to summarise the many takeaways from the three-day conference. Nevertheless, it is worth highlighting sessions such as the one exploring the history, socio-technical dynamics and research conducted on corpora from platforms such as Usenet; the important reflections stemmed from a study conducted by Rosario Rogel-Salazar and Alan Colín-Arce exploring the presence of feminist organisations in web archives; and the research conducted by Dr Andrea Stanton exploring Palestine and the concept of Palestinian heritage through the analysis of accounts and hashtags on Instagram.
Particularly valuable insights came also from Dr Kieran Hegarty’s paper, which explored the challenges posed by the unpredictable and frequent changes to platform design and policies, underscoring how this significantly influence what is included in web archives and how the material is made available.
Overall, the conference provided a valuable opportunity to learn about new research and to network with scholars and practitioners from around the globe. During lunch and coffee breaks, I had insightful conversations with several delegates about the challenges of preserving born-digital materials, particularly data generated on social media platforms. We exchanged ideas and reinforced the importance of developing shared practices to safeguard these resources. This theme strongly resonated in the closing session, which brought together voices from diverse career paths and regions to reflect on the current state of born-digital archives, collections, and memory, and to identify future directions.
Among the key takeaways were the need to foster data literacy and building digital citizens from a young age, as well as the importance of connecting with activists and minority communities to help them tell and preserve their stories.
The catalogue of the archive of human rights campaigner Peter Tatchell (b.1952) is now available.
Tatchell is best known for his LGBTQ rights advocacy. He was born in Melbourne, Australia, and emigrated to London in 1972, where he quickly became involved with the Gay Liberation Front (GLF). In 1973 he was the GLF’s delegate to the World Festival of Youth and Students in East Berlin, where he distributed leaflets in support of gay liberation inside the German Democratic Republic. In 1986 Tatchell published a pioneering self-help book, AIDS: A Guide to Survival [find in the SOLO catalogue] and was a founding member of the UK AIDS Vigil Organisation and the UK chapter of ACT UP (the AIDS Coalition to Unleash Power).
In May 1990, Tatchell was one of the founding members of the campaign group OutRage! (founded in reaction to the homophobic murder of actor Michael Boothe). OutRage! became well-known for their non-violent, direct-action protests opposing discrimination against gays and lesbians in the United Kingdom. Activists were frequently arrested and prosecuted for their protests, with Tatchell notably fined under the obscure Ecclesiastical Courts Jurisdiction Act (1860) for interrupting the Archbishop of Canterbury during his 1997 Easter sermon. Tatchell also made multiple attempts to arrest Robert Mugabe, the President of Zimbabwe, for human rights violations.
In 2011, OutRage! ceased operations and Tatchell founded The Peter Tatchell Foundation, a non-profit whose work seeks to promote and protect human rights in the UK and internationally.
In addition to his campaign work, Tatchell fought a number of parliamentary campaigns. In 1983 he ran as the Labour Party’s candidate in the Bermondsey constituency by-election, in 2000 he was an independent candidate for the Greater London Assembly, and in 2007 he was the Green Party’s candidate for Oxford East.
The archive mainly comprises Tatchell’s working papers for his protest and political campaigns, including research materials and protest ephemera (including a set of photographs of OutRage! protests by Steve Mayes), as well as papers relating to Tatchell’s journalism and travel writing. The catalogue is a first edition and additional protest ephemera and objects will be added following conservation work.
At the end of August, members of the Archives and Records Association gathered in Birmingham for conference, and I was grateful to be among them for a day. I chose to attend the first day, partially for that early-days energy, but mostly because one of the themes was ‘Digital Recordkeeping and the Cloud’. As a trainee in digital archiving, this seemed too on-the-nose to miss.
The venue was as practical as the location, but the sun shone in on a cosy array of sponsor stands and bleary-eyed delegates as we shuffled to find our preferred caffeinated medium. Then took our seats for the keynote. Alistair Brown shared with us his observations on the archive – and wider heritage sector – from the perspective of a funder. He touched on key challenges ahead, particularly climate change and ecosystem concerns which intersect with issues of digitalisation and data use; as well as giving us an overview of the National Lottery’s Heritage 2033 strategy.
Alistair’s keynote foreshadowed the themes of the day: Climate Advocacy and Education, Conservation, Passive and Sustainable Storage, and, of course, Digital Recordkeeping and the Cloud. The last of these proved much more popular than perhaps even the organisers were anticipating and a full lecture room meant that for the first session I instead dipped into a talk focussed on converting existing buildings into suitable archives. A thought-provoking offering from Oberlanders Architects, and an attractive option for those with buildings of note to make use of, potentially the only option for those of limited means, and potentially a greener solution that pleases the local planning committee.
I left lunch early to get a spot in the Digital theme for the afternoon and left the tea-break even earlier so I might get a spot on a chair rather than the floor for the second afternoon session! Across these, six speakers brought their take on topics such as: the carbon footprint of our data, the tension between what to keep and what to delete, encouraging better data storage practise, and of course what methods we might use to achieve these aims.
Anne Grzybowski (Heriot-Watt University) reminded us all of the carbon-footprint incurred by the ROT – the redundant, obsolete, or transitory documents and records we haphazardly accumulate unless management is routine and effective. ROT has always been a challenge for record managers, but are we more tempted to seek ways to simply increase our data budget than sort it out? The digital sphere has the potential to be “out of sight, out of mind” in a way that physical records cannot hope to be, but those charged with managing those records need to have a holistic view of the costs of storage, above and beyond the financial. Laura Peaurt took this further, looking at the options considered by the University of Nottingham for digital storage and how sustainable these were.
Buzzing in my mind as I stretched my legs around Birmingham’s canals between the talks and supper were a couple of thoughts: forefront of these is the trust organisations, particularly archives, must now place in external commercial organisations for the safe-keeping of their records and materials. Very few speakers started from a position other than a subscription to Microsoft 365. We spoke at length about the Cloud – a storage reality that means remote infrastructure, potentially residing in entirely different nations. While the available options are not entirely within our control, it would be naive to think that recordkeeping or archiving will be exempt from issues such as the mass outage Microsoft saw at the end of July. I was surprised that rather than being discussed at all, it seemed taken for granted that we would pin our digital preservation hopes on commerical cloud servers (and such like).
Not far behind this thought was “how will we sort it all out?!” We know that we are creating veritable digi-tonnes of data every day, both as individuals and organisations. Across the speakers I had heard, many attested to the truth we all suspect: many of us are poor at organising our digital lives, wasteful with the space we use, irresponsible with what we keep and what we don’t. So, what will the archivists of the future inherit? As I have discovered in my own work, the best intentions of archivists-past can leave archivists-present scratching their heads (or worse, shaking their fists).
If nothing else the ARA conference has inspired me to keep thinking big, and encourage those around me to do so as well. To forge future-oriented solutions, not simply plug the gaps now. With half an eye on what AI might do in this sphere, the time is ripe for us to build systems that just might cause Archivists of the future to say “I’m glad they thought of that”.
To commemorate the centenary of Franz Kafka’s death on 3 June 1924, the University of Oxford’s summer-long cultural festival Kafka24, inspired by Kafka’s life and work, features theatre, music, cabaret, exhibitions, lectures, talks, and free family activities including the spectacular Jitterbug Tent which will land in University Parks on South Parks Road from Friday 31st May to Sunday 2nd June, and insect activities at the Museum of Natural History on the evening of 5th June.
On the evening of 3rd June, the Bodleian Libraries will host Oxford Reads Kafka in the historic Sheldonian Theatre, a public reading of Kafka’s story ‘Metamorphosis’ in which the hapless Gregor Samsa wakes up to find he’s transformed into a bug, with readers including authors Lemn Sissay, Ben Okri, and Lisa Appignanesi (tickets available online).
And on 30 May the major exhibition Kafka: Making of an Icon, featuring manuscripts from the Bodleian Library’s Kafka archive, opens in the ST Lee Gallery of the Weston Library (free admission).
The full programme of lectures and events is at www.bodleian.ox.ac.uk/kafka24.