If you’ve read previous blog posts, you might have seen us mentioning our trainee projects at various points. As an Oxford trainee you have the chance to take on a personal project outside your regular duties to help you explore different parts of library work and leave your mark on the Bodleian. This all leads to the Graduate Trainee Showcase at the end of the year, where you get to present your work and explain what you’ve been doing to a captive audience of librarians and colleagues.
The showcase this year was held at Christ Church College and organised by fellow trainees Heidi, Rebecca, Jules, and Amy – huge thanks to them for their planning and effort (and for some last minute tech fixes). Over the next month we’ll be posting short summaries of our projects and presentations for anyone who couldn’t make it. Writing about our own work is too easy though, so we’ve each picked someone else’s project to talk about. Now to get us started, here’s some Royal Regalia, medical paraphernalia, and a whole lot of library data. Enjoy!
Promoting Special Collections at New College Library & Archives
Leah, New College Library
Written by Catherine Birch
Leah’s project involved designing an exhibition to promote New College Library’s incredible special collections. Having had the chance to see her exhibition in-person, I thought it looked incredible, but I’d had no idea just how much work had gone into it over the year!
Leah started by giving us some background on New College’s special collections, which house an astounding 384 historic manuscripts and over 30,000 rare books. Having specialised in medieval royalty and diplomacy during her MA, she wanted to highlight the wealth of royal history in the collection and work to improve public engagement with them. Identifying materials for display involved endless SOLO searching, trawling through various handlists, and consulting various colleagues, as well as every librarian’s secret weapon… a huge spreadsheet. Deciding which items to use in an exhibition is a very involved process, as Leah explained – you have to consider display space, transport logistics, and item condition before you even get into issues like audience interest and the exhibition theme. Having narrowed down which items she could practically include and which were most relevant to the topic, she picked her final items based on one key rule: are they fabulous?
From there she wrote item captions and labels, proofread them, proofread them again (those pesky oxford commas…), and got to work producing promotional material. Some of this material included posters, banners, booklets, and postcards, which looked great and were very nice to keep as souvenirs. Leah also promoted the exhibition through social media, university mailing lists, local news pages, and word of mouth, trying to reach library staff, students, and the public in equal measure. Her hard work definitely paid off, as they had over 150 visitors, making it the most successful exhibition of the year! Leah herself was on hand to answer any questions and talk to visitors, which was a nice touch that really improved engagement and interest (as did the free refreshments next door).
Even though the exhibition has finished, Leah is far from done getting people interested in New College Library’s special collections. She’s already planned an article about representations of King David in medieval manuscripts for an upcoming issue of New College Notes (the college’s scholarly journal), and she’s supporting a Curator’s Choice video highlighting a book published in 1687 to mark the coronation of James II. It was really interesting getting to see the full process of putting together an exhibition, and her display shone a spotlight on the sort of books and manuscripts that most librarians relish working with.

HML Grey Literature: Part II
Catherine, Bodleian Library (History Faculty Library)
Written by Olly Marshall
Catherine’s project revolved around a collection of grey literature from the History of Medicine Library, picking up the baton and expanding on the work done by previous HFL trainee Xanthe.
Catherine first explained to us the complicated past of the HML, occupying a site on Banbury Road but being under the stewardship of the Radcliffe Camera, with most of the material having now moved to the Humanities Library at the Schwarzman Centre and some of it being stored in our offsite storage facility. This is fairly standard for a lot of collections in the Bodleian- everything has been moved between many libraries and has had many different names.
The “grey literature” in question is far more interesting than the name suggest- it’s a mix of material produced by various medical institutions, but not controlled by a traditional commercial publisher like a book or journal article is. The HML collection includes a lot of organisational reports, speeches, statistics, training guides, public health pamphlets and other miscellaneous material important to understanding the history of healthcare and the work of significant institutions and professionals in the field.
The bulk of Catherine’s project involved going through 41 boxes of the material and creating handlists for them- a list describing each item in a box – to make the contents identifiable and discoverable to researchers.
The grey literature Catherine has been working with is now housed offsite and involved many requests for it all to be called up, looking through the contents and picking out important information such as institutions, authors, date ranges, topics, formats and other useful information for locating the right resource. This was frequently made difficult by material being in foreign languages, being in odd formats, using antiquated language or being catalogued poorly. By doing thorough research into the items, using templates for how to describe the items, and like any seasoned librarian – expecting and accepting a certain amount of chaos – Catherine developed a good system for listing the boxes consistently. All together there were approximately 450 items to describe and list, which is an amazing amount to achieve over the year!
The contents of the boxes will ultimately be published in a LibGuide that Catherine has been making to promote their use, make the collection navigable and link to boxes on SOLO for people to call them up from CSF. I was really impressed by the skills Catherine got to develop during her project and her methodical approach, and I thought that the collection sounds fascinating. Work like this is really important for ensuring library collections are accessible and available to use, and the efforts Catherine went through will benefit readers and library staff alike.
Managing & Adapting to Change
Rebecca, Bodleian Library (Reader Services)
Written by Jules McGee-Russell
Rebecca’s presentation focused on her research into different changes happening in the Old Bod and wider changes across the library service. This included the new Extended Lending rules at the Bodleian, the digital shift towards eBooks and AI usage, and how these things connect to the Climate Emergency.
Rebecca demonstrated her points using journalistic headlines over time, data from Freedom of Information Requests, and statistical forecasting she did herself using Python. The messages I took away were that there is a year-on-year decline in borrowing requests from readers in the Bodleian. Even though the lending rules have changed to allow some items to be loanable from the Old Bod, the number of annual requests to borrow physical books is decreasing. In contrast, the demand for eBooks is huge and ever-growing, as are the profits publishers are making from eBooks sales. 1/3 of students surveyed are, concerningly, reaching for AI over primary sources.

ChatGPT has been shown to amplify global inequalities by making assumptions about geographical locations that are not supported by data. AI “makes mistakes and tells people what they want to hear” according to research at the Oxford Internet Institute, influencing search strategies and resource discovery. Using these search strategies can reduce the “serendipity” of discovery, and can also dramatically change how users are interacting with libraries.
Rebecca questioned the transparency of publishers’ connections with fossil fuel companies, and how skyrocketing profits from eBook sales could be funding carbon emissions. There have been walkouts from journal editors protesting unethical fees for these eResources, and there is growing concern regarding the use of AI within publishing. Purchased goods and services made up 42% of Gardens, Libraries, and Museums (GLAM) emissions in 24/25, which may not even fully capture the scope of emissions related to library purchasing of eBooks and eResources. The effectiveness and integrity of climate pledges across publishing are also questionable – who is holding them to account, and who is measuring their success?
I was incredibly impressed with Rebecca’s research, and so were several others in the room. She was asked to share her slides with senior members of staff, and will be repeating the presentation to wider university staff groups. A great success, and it really shows how interesting and relevant her work was. These are concerns and developments that affect us all, and I truly admired the effort she put into excavating and illustrating them.
The presentation closed by recommending the university’s internal Carbon Literacy training module, which anyone can attend. There are certainly more steps to be taken both as individuals and as an institution to investigate and mitigate these impacts. This presentation is one that really stuck with me, and increased my awareness about how all these issues connect.
1 Kerche, F. W., Zook, M., & Graham, M. (2026).The Silicon gaze: A typology of biases and inequality in LLMs through the lens of place. Platforms & Society, 3. https://doi.org/10.1177/29768624251408919 (Original work published 2026)
Further reading for anyone who wants to learn more:
- University of Oxford (2026) New study finds that ChatGPT amplifies global inequalities. Available at: https://www.ox.ac.uk/news/2026-01-20-new-study-finds-chatgpt-amplifies-global-inequalities [Accessed: 9 June 2026].
- University of Oxford (2026) Friendly Al chatbots make more mistakes and tell people what they want to hear, study finds. Available at: https://www.ox.ac.uk/news/2026-04-29-friendly-ai-chatbots-make-more-mistakes-and-tell-people-what-they-want-to-hear [Accessed: 2 June 2026].
- Shimray, S.R. et al. (2025) Digital transformation in academic libraries: e-resources, OPACs and Al in information discovery. Reference Services Review, 53(2), 238-255.
- McCay-Peet, L. & Toms, E. (2011) Measuring the dimensions of serendipity in digital environments. Information Research, 16(3). [Accessed: 2 June 2026].
- Pu, Z. & Ruppel, E. (2025) Surprise Me: Serendipitous News Discovery and News Consumption. Communication Research.
- Jaillant, L. & Rees, A. (2023) Applying Al to digital archives: trust, collaboration and shared professional ethics. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 38(2), 571-585.
- GLAM statistics 24/25: https://www.glam.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/glam-environmental-sustainability-annual-report-2024-25.pdf.





Recent Comments